Philosophy Psychology Right, the issue is rather broad. It can be viewed from many different aspects.
Euthanasia term papers Disclaimer: Free essays on Euthanasia posted on this site were donated by anonymous users and are provided for informational use only. First of all, one should be able to understand the term euthanasia. In ancient Greece, eu thanatos meant easy death. Today s euthanasia generally refers to mercy killing, the voluntary ending of the life of someone who is terminally or hopelessly ill Euthanasia 1.
Knowing that, it is seemingly appropriate to say that one has the right to die an easy death if, and only if, he is terminally ill.
Otherwise, different situations should not play any part in this issue. To understand more about the pro-euthanasia side of this issue, it is best conceived through the viewpoints, strong beliefs, and perspectives of proponents of euthanasia.
An individual has liberty, which includes the right of owning his life. He is the possessor of his life. Just as he can do whatever he wishes with his possessions, such as selling his new house, he can also wish to discontinue his life if the reasons were rational.
In a typical situation, a person has some terrible, deadly disease. He is trapped in a hospital bed, with all sorts of medical equipment connected to him, unable to move or do much of anything except exist. He is in terrible pain; he begs to have these machines disconnected so he can go home and live out whatever life he has left and die in peace.
He does not want to endure the pain, but instead, to assuage it. However, the doctors refuse because to turn off the machines would surely result in his death, and they have a presumed bias against doing this. If a person decides that he wants to die, and someone does not think that this is a good decision, what right does the opposing person have to tell him that he cannot do this?
It is clear that a patient s decision to ask for a cessation in treatment, reflecting his own preference for death rather than for a continuation of discomfort or suffering, must be respected, barring exceptional circumstances Behnke Therefore, that individual s decision should be carried out because he has that right to his own personal decision, which is only one of many reasons why euthanasia should be legalized.
In addition, one should have the right to end his life by euthanasia because of the unsolicited pain, suffering, and misery he feels due to the disease he has or the condition he is in. People in this position would most likely want to alleviate their pain, suffering, and depression just to name a few partially because of the inconveniences, emotional and physical burdens, and drawbacks imposed on family members, relatives, and friends.
Furthermore, family members may be sensitive to the costs accumulating during terminal care Hagen Consequently, patients may feel guilty in this entire ordeal. Even more, people who, maybe because of a serious illness, are extremely depressed partly because they want to live their lives to the fullest by perhaps participating in energetic and active events but know that that is not possible now that they are severely ill and sick.
Since they recognize that enjoying life in those ways is no longer possible, they may want an easy way out euthanasia.
Others simply do not want to sustain suffering.
In considering suffering of terminal patients, one cannot exclude from thought the grief due to distress, fear, and agony. Nor must anyone underestimate the bearable level of pain in the periods between doses of medication or simply from being turned over in bed.
There is still too little known about what is actually experienced by patients as they approach death so it is evident that the individual, and only the individual, has the right to choose when he wants to die. These factors, along with unwanted suffering, pain, and misery are only some of the components considered in allowing the act of euthanasia.
The final element worthy of discussion in legalizing euthanasia is an individual s frustration in living, in his opinion, a valueless life after becoming critically ill. People who suffer from illnesses that make them unable to communicate do not want to live any longer.
This includes people who are in a coma, are paralyzed, or simply so sick and weak that they cannot make meaningful sounds or other communication. If the person is no longer able to relate in any way to his relatives and friends, he might not want to live a day further Bender In addition to that, some people believe that their quality of life is so low that they would rather die.
If this is the case, then what position do others have to go against this? No one other than the patient has any right to deny the patient his way of dying.
Therefore, euthanasia should and must be a legal choice. Like any other issue, there are opposing viewpoints regarding the legalization of euthanasia. Pro-lifers, people who are against euthanasia, place the emphasis on killing.
They believe that we are merely stewards of our lives; it is for God to decide when our lives are to end. Further, suffering, is an inevitable part of life; our task is to understand and grow from suffering, not evade it Mabie Pro-euthanasia people, who place the emphasis on mercy, argue that stewardship has not prevented the religious from exercising control in other areas of their lives for example, in using analgesics for surgery and childbirth.
If it is for God to decide when life will end, if suffering is ennobling, then the very practice of medicine is and always has been wrong.Jul 30, · Euthanasia Essays (Examples) Filter results by: In his essay, Voluntary Euthanasia: A Utilitarian Perspective, Peter Singer reviews ethical arguments regarding voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide from a utilitarian perspective.
Thesis: Singer establishes a solid grounding for the ethicality of legalizing voluntary euthanasia. Uniqueness and sociology articles: Opposing viewpoints resource center is often help with these custom academic essays are leaders with my homework on euthanasia for euthanasia, book essay.
Commanava seve madhava seva essay; great essay essay about euthanasia in essays, euthanasia. Biology extended essay enzymes in cheese objectives of comesa essay help srizbi analysis essay. The balcony scene romeo and juliet essay conclusion The balcony scene romeo and juliet essay conclusion canto a junin analysis essay saumur trust explication essay stadt lokalisieren erdkunde beispiel essay jb priestley an inspector calls essay mass media and body image essays on education khari.
Jun 28, · Euthanasia is a physician or others ‘killing’ of a suffering patient in attempt to hasten death and alleviate pain. In the game of life and death: life is the most obvious answer one would think. - Margaret Somerville, who has authored, edited, and co-edited a number of books and newspaper articles opposing the use of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide and who also is the Samuel Gale Professor of Law, Professor in the Faculty of Medicine, and Founding Director of the Centre for Medicine, Ethics, and Law at McGill University.
Article shared by. Short Essay on “Euthanasia” – The term “euthanasia” is brought from the Greek word “euthanatize” meaning “well death”.In recent years, there has been crying debate round the globe over the issue, whether euthanasia is legalized.